There's a ritual in venture capital that's become almost religious. Pilgrimages to Stanford dorm rooms. Office hours at Harvard Business School. The unspoken belief that the next billion-dollar company will emerge from the hallowed halls where privilege and pedigree are the price of admission.
I've never bought it.
Not because I have some contrarian streak to maintain, but because my own path exposed the lie at the heart of how we scout talent in this industry.
The Detour That Wasn't
I flunked out of college.
Not the glamorous kind of dropout story that gets polished into folklore about visionary rebels too brilliant for formal education. Just the ordinary kind: a kid who wasn't ready, couldn't focus, and watched his carefully constructed future collapse under the weight of academic probation.
Community college wasn't Plan B. It was a lifeline when I was drowning.
While my former classmates continued their linear ascent, I washed rental cars at Enterprise during the day and sat in fluorescent-lit classrooms at night. Those night classes were filled with people for whom education wasn't a birthright but a battle. Single parents studying after putting kids to bed. First-generation students navigating systems no one in their family understood. Veterans transitioning to civilian life.
No one was there to build a network or join the right clubs or secure the summer internship that their parents' friends had arranged. They were there because they believed education could transform their circumstances. Full stop.
The grit I witnessed in those classrooms wasn't the manufactured "hustle culture" that fills entrepreneurial podcasts. It was the quiet, relentless determination of people who simply put one foot in front of the other every single day, regardless of what stood in their way.
I eventually transferred, graduated from Columbia, landed at Lazard, and now run Daring Ventures. But I'll say this without hesitation: nothing I learned in the Ivy League or on Wall Street has proven more valuable than what I absorbed in those community college classrooms.
The Talent Map Is Wrong
The venture capital industry operates on an increasingly outdated map of where exceptional talent lives. We've convinced ourselves that merit rises automatically, that the cream floats to the top, that the best builders naturally find their way to Silicon Valley or Stanford or Y Combinator.
This is mythology masquerading as meritocracy.
Talent is equally distributed. Opportunity isn't. Intelligence isn't concentrated in elite zip codes or prestigious universities. But access certainly is.
The founders who attend top-tier schools and accelerators aren't categorically smarter or more capable than those who don't. They often just started closer to the finish line. Mistaking that head start for innate superiority is perhaps the most expensive error in modern venture capital.
The question isn't whether non-traditional founders can compete. It's whether investors can recognize excellence when it doesn't arrive in familiar packaging.
What Community College Builders Know That Stanford MBAs Don't
When you never had the luxury of failure, you develop muscles that others haven't had to use.
The typical founder journey is romanticized as heroic struggle. But there's a profound difference between choosing hardship as a character-building exercise and developing resilience because survival demanded it.
Community college founders often bring three distinct advantages to company building:
First, proximity to real problems. The biggest opportunities in America aren't hiding in pitch competitions. They're buried in broken systems that most privileged founders never have to navigate: healthcare bureaucracies, financial exclusion, housing insecurity, education access. At community college, these aren't abstract market opportunities. They're the daily reality for you and everyone around you.
Second, resourcefulness beyond capital. When you've never had the option to solve problems by throwing money at them, you develop creativity out of necessity. The most impressive early-stage execution I've seen hasn't come from founders with the biggest seed rounds, but from those who learned to build before they had resources.
Third, perspective through contrast. Many community college students have experienced both exclusion and inclusion, both scarcity and (relative) abundance. That ability to code-switch between worlds, to translate between systems, becomes an extraordinary leadership skill when building products for diverse markets.
WACC: Wall Street After Community College
These observations weren't just philosophical for me. They became the foundation of an initiative called WACC, Wall Street After Community College.
What started as informal mentoring crystallized into a structured program to help students from non-traditional backgrounds break into finance. Not because I'm altruistic, but because I recognized the market inefficiency: extraordinary talent was being systematically overlooked.
The results have confirmed what I suspected. WACC participants consistently outperform their peers from traditional backgrounds. Not despite their unconventional paths, but because of them. They bring hunger, perspective, and adaptability that can't be taught in case studies.
What's fascinating is watching how they approach problems. There's no entitlement, no expectation that systems should accommodate them. Just a clear-eyed pragmatism about identifying obstacles and methodically dismantling them.
That mindset is precisely what early-stage company building demands.
The Daring Ventures Thesis: Resilience > Resume
This perspective now forms the core of our investment thesis at Daring Ventures: Resilience trumps resume. Every time.
We look for signal in negative space, what's not visible on the LinkedIn profile. The gaps, transitions, and unconventional choices often reveal more about someone's capacity for founder-market fit than any prestigious internship.
Our focus is software that amplifies fundamentally human strengths: judgment, creativity, trust. The founders best positioned to build these tools are often those who've had to develop these capacities through adversity.
If someone has built their own legitimacy, navigated systems not designed for them, and emerged not just intact but stronger, that's someone who won't fold when the inevitable startup crises hit. That's someone who understands that perseverance isn't a temporary state but a permanent attribute.
That's alpha.
Finding Strength in the Cracks
The venture ecosystem has perfected pattern matching based on superficial signals: the right schools, the right previous employers, the right vocabulary, the right networks.
But the most extraordinary founders I've backed don't fit those patterns. They emerged from the cracks in the system.
Like the founder who worked night shifts at a hospital while taking community college classes, witnessing firsthand the administrative chaos that inspired his healthcare workflow company. Or the woman who navigated financial aid bureaucracy as a first-generation student and built a platform that has now helped millions access education funding.
These founders didn't start with warm introductions to tier-one VCs. They started with intimate knowledge of problems that needed solving and the tenacity to build solutions regardless of who noticed.
When I compare their execution to founders from more traditional backgrounds, the difference is stark. They don't pivot at the first sign of resistance. They don't expect the path to be smooth. They don't need external validation to maintain conviction.
The strongest founders I know didn't develop resilience through optional challenges. They developed it because circumstances demanded it, because giving up wasn't an option, because they had responsibilities beyond themselves.
That's the kind of foundation that survives market downturns, funding winters, and competitive threats.
Beyond Buzzwords
The startup ecosystem loves to fetishize struggle as long as it's the right kind of struggle, packaged in the right narrative, experienced by the right protagonist.
We celebrate the Stanford dropout but ignore the community college graduate. We romanticize "living in a car while coding" stories but overlook the single parent who coded between shifts. We amplify tales of immigrants from wealthy families while missing first-generation students figuring out FAFSA forms alone.
This selective celebration of struggle doesn't just miss investment opportunities. It reinforces the very systems that concentrate opportunity in the hands of the few.
The unsexy problems in America, the outdated infrastructures and broken institutions, won't be fixed by founders who've never had to navigate them. They'll be fixed by builders who understand them intimately, who've felt the friction personally, who've already been solving versions of these problems their whole lives.
The Alpha in Authenticity
What's perhaps most frustrating is watching privileged founders attempt to retrofit struggle narratives onto conventional paths because they recognize that resilience matters. The performative hustle. The manufactured origin story. The carefully curated "challenges" that never actually threatened their trajectory.
Authenticity can't be reverse-engineered. The founder who washed rental cars between classes doesn't need to convince anyone they understand hard work. It's embedded in their operating system.
I'm not suggesting community college attendance as some magical filter for founder quality. That would be replacing one flawed heuristic with another. Rather, I'm advocating for investors to recognize that exceptional talent development happens in many environments, often the ones least celebrated in startup mythology.
The strategic advantage comes from recognizing patterns others miss, from finding signal where others see noise.
The Investment Case for Wider Windows
This isn't about charity or diversity quotas. It's about capturing overlooked alpha. It's about recognizing that conventional talent funnels have become so overcrowded that they're yielding diminishing returns.
The most sophisticated investors I know have already recognized this shift. They're quietly expanding their aperture, looking beyond predictable patterns, finding extraordinary builders in unexpected places.
They understand that the next wave of transformative companies won't come exclusively from people who've been groomed from childhood to start companies. They'll come from people who've been solving problems their entire lives and finally gained access to the tools, capital, and platforms to scale those solutions.
A Personal Filter
I don't romanticize my time in community college. It wasn't some heroic chapter in a predetermined success story. It was humbling, uncertain, and often lonely.
But that experience became the filter through which I now evaluate both opportunities and founders. It taught me to recognize substance beneath style, to value execution over articulation, to bet on builders who persevere not because they read about grit in a business book but because they've lived it.
The greatest privilege I had wasn't getting into Columbia or working at Lazard. It was failing early and landing in an environment that showed me what real resilience looks like. It showed me that the most valuable talent often develops in the least prestigious environments.
That perspective has proven more valuable than any degree or credential could ever be. It's the foundation of every investment decision I make.
So no, I'm not interested in hearing how your time in an elite MBA program prepared you for the founder journey. Tell me instead about the systems you've had to navigate, the obstacles you've had to overcome, the responsibilities you've had to shoulder while pursuing your vision.
Tell me what you've built when nobody was watching, when no accelerator was supporting you, when no network was opening doors.
Because that's the foundation that survives when everything else falls apart. And in early-stage investing, that's what matters more than anything else.
The next great companies will be built by people who never expected anyone to hand them anything. They're not waiting for permission or validation or the right introductions.
They're already building. We just need to look in the right places to find them.
Joe Alalou is a co-founder and General Partner at Daring Ventures, a pre-seed fund investing in software that amplifies uniquely human skills in complex, relationship-driven fields.
If you enjoyed this, please share or subscribe!